【文档说明】moral人类与动物的道德观比较课件.ppt,共(41)页,1.172 MB,由飞向未来上传
转载请保留链接:https://www.ichengzhen.cn/view-107788.html
以下为本文档部分文字说明:
Morals,ApesandUsHowmuchdoweknowaboutusandothercreatures?Primates灵长类•Moraladj.[onlybeforenoun]•Relatingto
rightandwrongandthewaypeopleshouldbehave–Moralstandards/principles/values/behaviour–Moraldilemma–Moralobligati
on/duty–Amoralperson(apersonalwaystriestobehaveintherightway)Synonym:ethicalAboutMoral•Moralnoun•Morals:principlesofrightorwro
ngbehaviorthataregenerallyacceptedbyasociety–Havemorals•Somethingthatyoucanlearnfromastoryorexperience–moralof
AboutMoral•“Thefactthatmanknowsrightfromwrongproveshisintellectualsuperioritytotheothercreatures;butth
efactthathecandowrongproveshismoralinferioritytoanycreaturethatcannot”(MarkTwain).AboutMoral•Basedonwhatyouhaveresearched
andyourexperiencewithanimals,doyouthinkBinti,thegorillasavedthethree-year-oldboyoutofempathy(pity)orinstinct?Giveyo
urreasons.Pre-readingDiscussionReadingTasks•Whatisthewriter’spurposeofwritingthisarticle?•Doesthewriterbasedhisargumentsonfirst-
handmaterial?•Howmanyexperimentshavebeenconductedinthearticle,drawatableabouteachexperimentwithinforma
tionabouttheexperimenter,objective,procedureandfindingsorconclusions?experiments12345experimenterUniversityofZurichEthologistEdua
rdStammbachwriterobjectiveTesttheirabilitytoreininaggressivebehaviorandactcooperativelyprocedureFirst,once,then,during,ResultsorfindingsDominanto
nesInhibittheiraggressionDiscussionquestions•Findoutthetrainofthoughtofthewriter?•Workouttheoutlineofthewriting•Doyouthinkthe
writers’argumentsareconvincing?•Howdoyouunderstand“butusinganexpressiontopredictaresponseisnotthesameasseeingtheexpressionasanindicationofan
other’semotionsatthetime.(para.15)”?•Howdoyouthinkof“wecanconsciouslyevaluatewhetherbehaviorisrightorwrong…entw
inedwiththeself-interestshownbyotheranimals.”?(Para.20)•(1-4)Putforwardthethesis:canothercreaturesshare,cooperate,pun
ishcheaters,showempathy,andactaltruistically?•(5-19)Experimentsshowanimalsarebynomeansrobotsdrivensolelybyinstinctualresponsesbutno
experimenttodatehasprovidedevidencethatanimalsareawareofothers’beliefsorintentions,sotherecanbenoethicaljudgment.•(20)conclusion:A
skingwhatitmeanstobemoralchallengesustothinkabouthowourowncapacityformoralagencycameabout.StructureAnalysis•(1-4)Putforwardthethesis:canothercreatu
resshare,cooperate,punishcheaters,showempathy,andactaltruistically?–(1)Aneventcapturepeople’sattention:afemalegorillarescuedanunconsciou
s3-year-oldboy–(2)Peoplewonderaboutwhygorilladidthis–(3)Sofar,theanswerisnotclear.–(4)Thewriter’swayoftacklingthebroadlyconcern
edquestionofwhatmentaltraitscauseustobehavemorallyandtowhatextentotheranimalspossessthosetools.StructureAnalysis•
(5-6)Anexperimenttestsmacaquemonkeys’abilitytoreininaggressivebehaviorandactcooperatively.–(5)introducetheproceduresoftheexperiment–(
6)Theresultoftheexperiment:althoughthemonkeyswouldcontroltheiraggressivebehaviorandactcooperatively,theirpositioninthecommunitywouldnotchange.•Atfir
st,threaten…tokeepthemaway•Then,learn…followandwaitedtograb•Beforelong,approachedpeacefullyandallowed…•Further…grooming…evenduring
…StructureAnalysis•(7-8)Inhibitionplaysacrucialroleinmaintainingsocialconventionsamongthem.–(7)monkeyshavearudi
mentarysenseofownershipandrespectforproperty.–(8)Bydefendingandrespectingtheownershipandproperty,themonkeysintheexperimentshows
howinhibitionplaysacrucialroleinmaintainingsocialconventionsamongthem.StructureAnalysis•(9-10)Experim
entstestedthepossibilitythatrule-breakersinacommunitywouldbepunished.–(9)Throughthefirstexperiment,itseemsthatindividualswerebeingpunished
forbeinginappropriatelysilent,fordeceptivelywithholdinginformationaboutarichfoodsource.–(10)outsiderswo
n’tbeattackedthusindicates:membersofanestablishedrhesuscommunityabidebyarulethatsays:attackmembersthatfindfooda
nddon’tshareit.StructureAnalysis•(5-10)Researchindicatesthatanimalscaninhibittheirimpulsesandpunishthosewhoviolatec
ommunityrules.–(5-6)Anexperimenttestsmacaquemonkeys’abilitytoreininaggressivebehaviorandactcooperatively
–(7-8)Inhibitionplaysacrucialroleinmaintainingsocialconventionsamongthem.–(9-10)Experimentstestedthepossibilitythatrule-breakersinacom
munitywouldbepunished.StructureAnalysis•(11)ToproveBinti’sbehavioroutofempathy,scientistshavetoprovethatanimalsunderstan
dthethoughtsandfeelingsofothers.(transition)StructureAnalysis•(12-16)ManyExperimentsdonebeforehaveprovided
awindowonanimalemotionthathasyettobeopenedbymorerecentscientificobservations.•(13)oneexperimentwasdesignedtoseeifamonkeycouldinterpretanothe
rmonkey’sfacialexpression.•(14)theassumptionundertheexperimentanditsresult•(15)usinganexpressiontopredict
aresponseisnotthesameasseeingtheexpressionasindicationofanother’semotions.•(16)wecouldnotprovemonkey’sresponseismotiva
tedbyempathy.StructureAnalysis•(17-18)Theexperimentshowsanimalstendedtoshowaltruisticbehaviortoeachother
.Buttherearemorepossibilityfortheiraltruism.•(19)Analysisandconclusionoftheexperiments:sincenoexperimenttodatehasprovidedevidencethatanimals
areawareofothers’beliefsorintentions,therecanbenoethicaljudgment.•(20)conclusion:Askingwhatismeanstobemoralchallengesustothinkabouthowourowncapa
cityformoralagencycameabout.StructureAnalysisReadingScholarlywriting•Subject:someaspectofhistory,sociology,political
philosophy,literarycriticism,ormanyotherfields.•Afairlyhighdegreeofformality–avoidcolloquialism–Useofformalwordsandterms–Highlyvaried
andlongandcomplexsentencestructures•Aconcernforclearpresentationofmaterialandargument,resultingincarefullogicallink
ingofparagraphsandsentences.•Andtodate,nostudyofapeintelligencecomesclosetoshowingthatorangutans,gorillas,orchimpa
nzeeshavethementalsophisticationofa10-year-oldhuman.(Para.3)LanguagePointsnearlyshowComplexintellectualability•Andoneinci
dentisnotenoughtowarrantconclusions.(Para.3)LanguagePointsVt.Provideadequategroundsfor/justify•ButBinti’sactionsdoraiseth
epublicandscientificinterestinthebroadquestionofwhatmentaltraitscauseustobehavemorallyandtowhatextentotheranimalpossessthose
tools.(Para.4)LanguagePointsDistinctivefeaturesofthemindProvoke/bringaboutthepublic’saswellasthescientists’interestinActintherightway•Asap
sychologist,I’minterestedinthetechniquesweusetogetatthesequestions:Canothercreaturesshare,cooperate,punishcheaters,showempathy,and
actaltruistically.(Para.4)LanguagePointsInawaythatshowsyoucareaboutotherpeopleandtheirinterestsmorethanyoucareabouty
ourselfunderstandpity•Ina1988study,UniversityofZurichethologistEduardStammbachsetupanexperimentwithlong-tailedmacaquemonkeys
totesttheirabilitytoreininaggressivebehaviorandactcooperatively.(Para.5)LanguagePointsReinin/reinback:tolimitorcontrolsomethingthathasdevelopedtoomuc
horcontinuedfortoolongDesignedanexperiment•Ratherthanchasingspecialistsawayoreatingalltheirpopcorn,theybegantoin
hibittheiraggression.LanguagePointsInsteadofDrivingthespecialistawayRestraintheirwarlikebehavior•Specialistkepttheirlowrankbutwereallowed
amomentatthehightablewhentheirskillswereofusetotheroyalty.LanguagePointsHightableBrE:atableataformalmealwherethemostimportan
tpeopleeat,forexampleatatraditionaluniversity•Althoughthesemightseemtobestrictlyhumanconcerns,territorialanimalssuchas
sunfish,lizards,sparrows,andgibbonsareinvestedintheseissues..LanguagePointsbecaredaboutonlybythehumanbeingsaredevotedto/com
mittedto•Stayingclosetothetubeandlookingatitwerenotsufficientcuesofownershipfromthedominant’sperspective.Adominantmacaquewouldappeartoinhibi
titsimpulsetograbthetubeifasubordinatehelditclosetoitsbody.LanguagePointsInthedominant’spointofviewHoldbackitsmotivatingforce•
Butinanysocialsituationwithconventions,individualsoftenfindthatitpaystobreaktherules.LanguagePointsItpaystodo:itisworthwhile(profi
table)todoItpaystodo:itneedstopayapricetodo•Itwasasifindividualswerebeingpunishedforbeinginappropriatelysilent,fordeceptivelywithhol
dinginformationaboutarichfoodsource.LanguagePointsrefusingtoofferinginformationinamisleadingway•Theybeelinedto
thefoodandeitherconsumeditonthespotorgobbledafewpiecesandthenmovedtoanewlocationwithastash.LanguagePointsateitwithoutdelayWalke
dtothefoodinthestraightcourseGulpedafewpiecesoutofsight•Itseemslikelythattheactorspickeduponachangeintheactivityoftherecei
vers,onethatwasconsistentenoughtopredicttheshock.LanguagePointsBecamefamiliarwith•Thisexperimentleftmanylooseends.Al
thoughitisclearthatrhesusmonkeyscanlearntoavoidshockbyattendingtoafacialexpression,wedon’tknowifthisresponseismotivatedbyempathy,andempath
yisnecessaryforaltruism.LanguagePointsFinaldetailsthathavenotyetbeendealtwith(veryformal)topayattentiontoimpelled•Thereisno
ambiguityaboutwhatthegorilladid...•Wouldshehaveactedinthesamewaytowards…•Itpaystobreaktherules.•Thereisnowaytopredict…Sente
ncestructure•Captureanevent•Captureone’sattention•Captureone’sheart•Fullygraspthedistinctionbetween•Raisethepublicandscientificinterestin•Set
upanexperiment•Receiveapopcorntreat•MaintainsocialconventionsExpressions•Reininaggressivebehavior•Refrainfro
mpullingthechain•Inhibittheimpulse•Abidebyarule/adhereto•Breaktherules/violatecommunityrules•EmployrulelikestrategiesExpression
sDarwin’sTheoryofRevolution❖Evolutionisthetheorythatmodernorganismshavedescendedfromancientorganisms.❖Darwinist
hemanwhocameupwiththeTheoryofEvolution.In1831hewenttodifferentremoteislands.Thetriplastedfor5years.30yearslaterheactuallypublish
edabookonhistheoryofNaturalSelection.SurvivalofTheFittestIndividualswhosecharacteristicsarewellsuitedtotheirenvironmen
tsurvive.Individualswhosecharacteristicsarenotwellsuitedtotheirenvironmenteitherdieorleavefeweroffsp
ring.RattlesnakeswithnorattlesEvolutionbynaturalselectionWildanimalsshowsimilartendencieslikewhatdomesticani
malshave.Deer-competitionamongstmalestobeasuitor.Tallerplantswillreceivesunshine.Plantsthatrootdeeplywil
lgetwater.Animalscompetitionforfood-birdnestsCreationism(创造宇宙说)•Thepositionthattheaccountofthecreationoftheuniversegivenatthebeginningoft
heBibleisliterallytrue.•Theprimalstorytoexplainallofhumanexistenceandtheworld•BeingHumanistobeGodlikeanddifferentfromtheresto
fcreation•Communicable(shared)attributesofGod–Mind–AttributesofIntellect–Heart–MoralAttributes–Will–AttributesofPurpose