【文档说明】moral人类与动物的道德观比较课件.ppt,共(41)页,1.172 MB,由飞向未来上传
转载请保留链接:https://www.ichengzhen.cn/view-107788.html
以下为本文档部分文字说明:
Morals,ApesandUsHowmuchdoweknowaboutusandothercreatures?Primates灵长类•Moraladj.[onlybeforenoun]•Relatingtorig
htandwrongandthewaypeopleshouldbehave–Moralstandards/principles/values/behaviour–Moraldilemma–Moralobl
igation/duty–Amoralperson(apersonalwaystriestobehaveintherightway)Synonym:ethicalAboutMoral•Moralnoun•Morals:principlesofrig
htorwrongbehaviorthataregenerallyacceptedbyasociety–Havemorals•Somethingthatyoucanlearnfromastoryorexperience–mora
lofAboutMoral•“Thefactthatmanknowsrightfromwrongproveshisintellectualsuperioritytotheothercreatures;butthefactthathecandowrongproveshi
smoralinferioritytoanycreaturethatcannot”(MarkTwain).AboutMoral•Basedonwhatyouhaveresearchedandyourexpe
riencewithanimals,doyouthinkBinti,thegorillasavedthethree-year-oldboyoutofempathy(pity)orinstinct?Giveyourreas
ons.Pre-readingDiscussionReadingTasks•Whatisthewriter’spurposeofwritingthisarticle?•Doesthewriterbasedhisarguments
onfirst-handmaterial?•Howmanyexperimentshavebeenconductedinthearticle,drawatableabouteachexperimentwith
informationabouttheexperimenter,objective,procedureandfindingsorconclusions?experiments12345experimenterUniversityofZurichEthologistEduardStammbac
hwriterobjectiveTesttheirabilitytoreininaggressivebehaviorandactcooperativelyprocedureFirst,once,then,during,Resul
tsorfindingsDominantonesInhibittheiraggressionDiscussionquestions•Findoutthetrainofthoughtofthewriter?•Workouttheoutlineofth
ewriting•Doyouthinkthewriters’argumentsareconvincing?•Howdoyouunderstand“butusinganexpressiontopredictarespons
eisnotthesameasseeingtheexpressionasanindicationofanother’semotionsatthetime.(para.15)”?•Howdoyouthinkof“wecanconsciouslyevaluatewhet
herbehaviorisrightorwrong…entwinedwiththeself-interestshownbyotheranimals.”?(Para.20)•(1-4)Putforwardthethesis:canothercreaturesshare,cooperate,pu
nishcheaters,showempathy,andactaltruistically?•(5-19)Experimentsshowanimalsarebynomeansrobotsdrivensolelybyinstinctualresponsesbutnoexper
imenttodatehasprovidedevidencethatanimalsareawareofothers’beliefsorintentions,sotherecanbenoethicaljudgment.•
(20)conclusion:Askingwhatitmeanstobemoralchallengesustothinkabouthowourowncapacityformoralagencycameabout.Struc
tureAnalysis•(1-4)Putforwardthethesis:canothercreaturesshare,cooperate,punishcheaters,showempathy,andactaltruistically?–(
1)Aneventcapturepeople’sattention:afemalegorillarescuedanunconscious3-year-oldboy–(2)Peoplewonderaboutwhygorilladid
this–(3)Sofar,theanswerisnotclear.–(4)Thewriter’swayoftacklingthebroadlyconcernedquestionofwhatmenta
ltraitscauseustobehavemorallyandtowhatextentotheranimalspossessthosetools.StructureAnalysis•(5-6)Anexperimenttestsmacaquemonk
eys’abilitytoreininaggressivebehaviorandactcooperatively.–(5)introducetheproceduresoftheexperiment–(6)Theresultoftheexperime
nt:althoughthemonkeyswouldcontroltheiraggressivebehaviorandactcooperatively,theirpositioninthecommunitywouldnotchange.•Atfirst,threaten…tokeepthe
maway•Then,learn…followandwaitedtograb•Beforelong,approachedpeacefullyandallowed…•Further…grooming…evenduring…StructureAnaly
sis•(7-8)Inhibitionplaysacrucialroleinmaintainingsocialconventionsamongthem.–(7)monkeyshavearudimentaryse
nseofownershipandrespectforproperty.–(8)Bydefendingandrespectingtheownershipandproperty,themonkeysinthee
xperimentshowshowinhibitionplaysacrucialroleinmaintainingsocialconventionsamongthem.StructureAnalysis•(9-10)Experimentstestedthep
ossibilitythatrule-breakersinacommunitywouldbepunished.–(9)Throughthefirstexperiment,itseemsthatindiv
idualswerebeingpunishedforbeinginappropriatelysilent,fordeceptivelywithholdinginformationaboutarichfoodsource.–(10)outsiderswon’tbeattac
kedthusindicates:membersofanestablishedrhesuscommunityabidebyarulethatsays:attackmembersthatfindfoodanddon’tshareit.Structu
reAnalysis•(5-10)Researchindicatesthatanimalscaninhibittheirimpulsesandpunishthosewhoviolatecommunityr
ules.–(5-6)Anexperimenttestsmacaquemonkeys’abilitytoreininaggressivebehaviorandactcooperatively–(7-8
)Inhibitionplaysacrucialroleinmaintainingsocialconventionsamongthem.–(9-10)Experimentstestedthepossibilitythatrule-breakersinacommunitywouldbep
unished.StructureAnalysis•(11)ToproveBinti’sbehavioroutofempathy,scientistshavetoprovethatanimalsunder
standthethoughtsandfeelingsofothers.(transition)StructureAnalysis•(12-16)ManyExperimentsdonebeforehaveprovidedawindowonani
malemotionthathasyettobeopenedbymorerecentscientificobservations.•(13)oneexperimentwasdesignedtoseeifamonkeycouldinterpretanothermonkey
’sfacialexpression.•(14)theassumptionundertheexperimentanditsresult•(15)usinganexpressiontopredictaresponseisnotthesa
measseeingtheexpressionasindicationofanother’semotions.•(16)wecouldnotprovemonkey’sresponseismotivatedbyempathy.S
tructureAnalysis•(17-18)Theexperimentshowsanimalstendedtoshowaltruisticbehaviortoeachother.Buttherearemorepossibilityfortheiral
truism.•(19)Analysisandconclusionoftheexperiments:sincenoexperimenttodatehasprovidedevidencethatanimalsareawareofothers’beliefsorintentions,the
recanbenoethicaljudgment.•(20)conclusion:Askingwhatismeanstobemoralchallengesustothinkabouthowourowncapacityformoralagencycameabout.Struc
tureAnalysisReadingScholarlywriting•Subject:someaspectofhistory,sociology,politicalphilosophy,literarycriticism,ormanyotherfie
lds.•Afairlyhighdegreeofformality–avoidcolloquialism–Useofformalwordsandterms–Highlyvariedandlongandcomple
xsentencestructures•Aconcernforclearpresentationofmaterialandargument,resultingincarefullogicallinkingofparagraphsandsentences.•Andtodate,nostudyofap
eintelligencecomesclosetoshowingthatorangutans,gorillas,orchimpanzeeshavethementalsophisticationofa10-year-oldhuman.(Para.3
)LanguagePointsnearlyshowComplexintellectualability•Andoneincidentisnotenoughtowarrantconclusions.(Para.3)LanguagePointsVt.Providea
dequategroundsfor/justify•ButBinti’sactionsdoraisethepublicandscientificinterestinthebroadquestionofwhatmentaltraitscauseustobehavemorallyandtowha
textentotheranimalpossessthosetools.(Para.4)LanguagePointsDistinctivefeaturesofthemindProvoke/bringaboutthepublic’sasw
ellasthescientists’interestinActintherightway•Asapsychologist,I’minterestedinthetechniquesweusetogetatthesequestions:Canothercreatu
resshare,cooperate,punishcheaters,showempathy,andactaltruistically.(Para.4)LanguagePointsInawaythatshows
youcareaboutotherpeopleandtheirinterestsmorethanyoucareaboutyourselfunderstandpity•Ina1988study,UniversityofZurichethologistEduardStam
mbachsetupanexperimentwithlong-tailedmacaquemonkeystotesttheirabilitytoreininaggressivebehaviorandactcooperatively.(Para.5)LanguagePointsRein
in/reinback:tolimitorcontrolsomethingthathasdevelopedtoomuchorcontinuedfortoolongDesignedanexperiment•Ratherthanchasingspecialistsawayoreatingallt
heirpopcorn,theybegantoinhibittheiraggression.LanguagePointsInsteadofDrivingthespecialistawayRestraintheirwarlikebehavior•Specialistkepttheirlowran
kbutwereallowedamomentatthehightablewhentheirskillswereofusetotheroyalty.LanguagePointsHightableBrE:atableataformalmealwherethemostimportantpeopleea
t,forexampleatatraditionaluniversity•Althoughthesemightseemtobestrictlyhumanconcerns,territorialanimalssuchassunfish,lizards,sparrows,andgibbonsare
investedintheseissues..LanguagePointsbecaredaboutonlybythehumanbeingsaredevotedto/committedto•Stayingclosetothetub
eandlookingatitwerenotsufficientcuesofownershipfromthedominant’sperspective.Adominantmacaquewouldappeartoi
nhibititsimpulsetograbthetubeifasubordinatehelditclosetoitsbody.LanguagePointsInthedominant’spointofviewHoldbackitsmotivatingforce•Butinany
socialsituationwithconventions,individualsoftenfindthatitpaystobreaktherules.LanguagePointsItpaystodo:itiswo
rthwhile(profitable)todoItpaystodo:itneedstopayapricetodo•Itwasasifindividualswerebeingpunishedforbe
inginappropriatelysilent,fordeceptivelywithholdinginformationaboutarichfoodsource.LanguagePointsrefusin
gtoofferinginformationinamisleadingway•Theybeelinedtothefoodandeitherconsumeditonthespotorgobbledafewpiecesandthenmovedtoanewlocationwit
hastash.LanguagePointsateitwithoutdelayWalkedtothefoodinthestraightcourseGulpedafewpiecesoutofsight•Itseemslikelythattheactorsp
ickeduponachangeintheactivityofthereceivers,onethatwasconsistentenoughtopredicttheshock.LanguagePointsBecamefa
miliarwith•Thisexperimentleftmanylooseends.Althoughitisclearthatrhesusmonkeyscanlearntoavoidshockbyattendingtoafacialexpression,wedon’tknowif
thisresponseismotivatedbyempathy,andempathyisnecessaryforaltruism.LanguagePointsFinaldetailsthathavenotyetbeendealt
with(veryformal)topayattentiontoimpelled•Thereisnoambiguityaboutwhatthegorilladid...•Wouldshehaveactedinthesamewaytowards
…•Itpaystobreaktherules.•Thereisnowaytopredict…Sentencestructure•Captureanevent•Captureone’sattention•Captureone’sheart•Fullygraspt
hedistinctionbetween•Raisethepublicandscientificinterestin•Setupanexperiment•Receiveapopcorntreat•Maintainsoc
ialconventionsExpressions•Reininaggressivebehavior•Refrainfrompullingthechain•Inhibittheimpulse•Abide
byarule/adhereto•Breaktherules/violatecommunityrules•EmployrulelikestrategiesExpressionsDarwin’sTheoryofRevolution❖Evolutionisthe
theorythatmodernorganismshavedescendedfromancientorganisms.❖DarwinisthemanwhocameupwiththeTheoryofEvolution.In1831hewenttodifferent
remoteislands.Thetriplastedfor5years.30yearslaterheactuallypublishedabookonhistheoryofNaturalSelection.SurvivalofTheF
ittestIndividualswhosecharacteristicsarewellsuitedtotheirenvironmentsurvive.Individualswhosecharacteristicsarenotwellsuitedtotheirenvironmenteit
herdieorleavefeweroffspring.RattlesnakeswithnorattlesEvolutionbynaturalselectionWildanimalsshowsimilartendencieslikewhat
domesticanimalshave.Deer-competitionamongstmalestobeasuitor.Tallerplantswillreceivesunshine.Plantsthatrootdeeplywillgetwater.Animalscompeti
tionforfood-birdnestsCreationism(创造宇宙说)•Thepositionthattheaccountofthecreationoftheuniversegivenatthebeginningofth
eBibleisliterallytrue.•Theprimalstorytoexplainallofhumanexistenceandtheworld•BeingHumanistobeGodlikeanddifferentfromtherestofcreation
•Communicable(shared)attributesofGod–Mind–AttributesofIntellect–Heart–MoralAttributes–Will–AttributesofPurpose